[No Code]pendency: Avoiding the Traps of Inflexible Automation

If your current workflow tool is supposed to be “no code,” how come you still have to call in backup to make even marginal changes? 

It’s because most of these solutions are made by developers, for developers — which means you get pulled in by features that appear to be no code, but lack the configurability you actually need to design and deploy workflows on your own. 

And the automation isn’t the only thing that’s inflexible; many of these solutions lock you in with per-transaction pricing, can’t communicate with your legacy systems, and weren’t built to support the full scope of your department’s responsibilities like sharing reports, escalating matters, and providing transparency. But there’s a way to spot these no-code pretenders from a mile away – and it’s easier than you think to break away.

Join us on Tuesday, July 18th as we dive into what to look for in legal technology that is truly no-code and how to put the tools to automate in the hands of the people who know your processes best.

We’ll be covering:

• “Trial vs. trusted” no-code workflow automation and how to spot the difference
• Past-proven workflow wins for quick ROI (that don't require learning code or offloading to costly developers).
•  How to scale your automation platform across processes like matter intake, NDA approval, risk assessment, and more
• The playbook from your legal ops peers on building an effective technology roadmap and maximizing adoption 

• Brian McGovern, Executive CLC Solutions, Mitratech
• Rachita Maker, Global Head of Legal Ops, Tech and Consulting, DWF Law LLP
• Spencer Shubert, Senior Manager of Legal Systems at WeWork